Rudiment.Ⅰ

 ◎Basically, to us, to anyone whose mind is unknown as much as myself except only "myself", only that fact must be left to us, personally.

◎Only upper truth is the absolute consistent it.

◎Any contract must be composed with the premise.

◎Generally, trust could be only expedient. Nevertheless, the manner or attitude to which only it should not be regarded as trustworthy.

  That applicable range has no condition except "myself".

◎The most credible truth is, otherwise, should be what only contract should be preceded. 

   Though what neglects the truth must be assessed as fake.

◎However, overwhelmingly precise duplicate in general is so convincing at least practically.

   And that idea is at least in the term of social credibility, trustworthy.

◎If upper matter could be set so convincingly, even trust could be seen so integral.

   Never yet, that should not be neglected.

   Just only it could be another dimensioned thing.

◎Consequently, only one question could be left to us. "How we should personally judge the thing in question could come to an agreement between trust and contract?"

   

Oct. 2nd.    2021



コメント

コメントを投稿

このブログの人気の投稿

Rudiment Ⅲ

Very integrally basic issue is obviously trust makes us regard mutually very contradictory reality in which we see it as so private and so formally or officially as dutiful. Necessarily, in work, as the same team member, to one colleague, or work fellow, we usually easily to have both consciousness. Nevertheless, business, or working accompanying efficiency rating or so, necessarily rating responsible ones, the same team fellows or so and either rated one should have objective stance at regarding trust, that necessarily must be publicly just and appropriate regard. Paul Ricœur mentions in  Soi-même comme un autre  as next. "On the contrary just to contracting relevance of reasonable human relation and either merely over the subjective morality, according to he term signified at ethical text as  Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences , it must be defined as field of objective spirit. Citizen society as competitively interest relevant also could not output organic personality r
続きを読む

RudimentⅡ

◎Ultimately, which we should believe in contracted promise or person's credibility, eventually only the question to us is left. ◎If we believe in contract, no matter who the one contracts me is, that thing is not so important. Otherwise, if we believe in only person, no matter what kind of contract I did, that thing is not so important. However, the latter case is contradictory. ◎Eventually, only certain contract to us is just what we can trust not having distrust. And if we could judge only the truth is the correct, consequently only to the one who contracted us should be trusted to us. The thing consists in next truth. If the contract we'd believe in has been done to us, only the thing and the one who contracted with us or contracted us should be trusted by us. ◎And, necessarily, we should believe in only the one who could contract mutually the most. Because if the contract could be left to us, only the one who must believe in it should be trusted by us. Oct. 2nd    2021
続きを読む